Baruch Vainshelboim Stanford (April) All Details Inside! >> The write-up shares details about the new study on masking by a clinical exercise physiologist.
National Institutes of Health or NIH in the United States has recently published a medical hypothesis by a Clinical Exercise Physiologist, Baruch Vainshelboim. The medical journal published by the doctor confirms that wearing a face mask can lead to severe health issues, and it lacks in preventing the spread of COVID-19.
It is the Stanford Study which the NCBI releases under the National Institutes of Health. The study reveals that masking is not effective in preventing the spread of infections and viruses of COVID-19 and the use of a mask is even harmful to the health of the wearers.
What is the Baruch Vainshelboim Stanford Study all about, and what CDC has to say for the study?
Who is Baruch Vainshelboim?
Baruch Vainshelboim is a doctor by profession, working as the professor in the cardiology division, veteran’s Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System/Stanford University, United States. He is also serving as the clinical exercise physiologist.
Dr. Baruch Vainshelboim recently started grabbing the attention of the people after NIH published his latest hypothesis. The medical hypothesis of Baruch Vainshelboim highlights the inefficiency of wearing masks to prevent COVID-19 viruses.
The Baruch Vainshelboim Stanford study was published to challenge the report of CDC where it is mentioned that wearing a mask for prevention of COVID-19 virus is necessary. In his hypothesis, the doctor confirmed that wearing a mask is not effective in preventing the virus of COVID-19. It also causes different health complications that he mentioned in a table.
Soon after the hypothesis by the doctor was released and supported by NIH, people started collecting information about the publication to learn more about the efficiency of masking.
What is the Baruch Vainshelboim Stanford Study Highlights?
Despite the scientific proof from CDC regarding masking for preventing COVID-19 viruses, Baruch Vainshelboim, a researcher and clinical physiologist, has published a hypothesis where he clarifies that wearing a mask is not effective in preventing COVID-19 spread.
He provides data highlighting that non-medical and medical-grade masking and cloth masks are not effective in preventing human-to-human virus and infection transmission. Therefore, data is against the use of face-covering and masking.
However, CDC has already confirmed that wearing a mask or face covering is necessary to prevent the COVID-19 virus. But, Baruch Vainshelboim Stanford Research is totally against the guidelines despite being approved by World Health Organization.
People’s Reaction on the Hypothesis by Baruch Vainshelboim
Soon, NIH released the hypothesis; people started taking social media and discussion forums where they are providing their suggestions related to the publications.
Despite considerable evidence, people find it hard to believe the thesis and consider it a fake publication. Some people continue with the guidelines of WHO and still wearing a mask. So, there are no changes in the lifestyle of people after the study and research by Baruch Vainshelboim.
Baruch Vainshelboim Stanford hypothesis and research have been not supported by most of the people.
The study claims that it can cause health issues and may not effectively prevent the spread of COVID-19 viruses. Despite all the claims, people are still following the standard guidelines.
Moreover, we are also here to provide you with information concerning the study. We are not advising you not to wear masks as we are not the authority of the subject.
What you have to say about the Stanford Study by Baruch Vainshelboim? Please share your opinion in the comment section.